Saturday, April 10, 2010

Con Ed "Juices" Us Again!

If you haven't gotten over the shock of your water rates going up 12.9% next month, maybe you shouldn't read any further.

Never one to let a fiscal year pass without a rate hike, the Public Service Commission has authorized Con Edison to institute a 12% rate hike to be spread out over three years starting next month.

This hike should also not surprise anyone out there as Con Edison customers in New York City and Westchester already pay more for their power than anyone living on the mainland of the United States.

Only people living in Alaska, Hawaii and the islands off New England pay more.

Peter J. Mahon

Your Water Bill is Going Up...Again!

Jack and Jill went up a hill to fetch a pail of water.
Jack fell down and broke his crown
And Jill came tumbling after..
Up got Jack and home did trot
As fast as he could caper
He went to bed and bound his head
With vinegar and brown paper.


Jack is going to need a lot more than “vinegar and brown paper" to treat his headache by the time the New York City Water Board gets through with him!

New Yorkers will pay nearly 13 percent more for each drop of water they use starting July 1 if (make that "when") an increase proposed Friday by the Department of Environmental Protection is approved.

Surprised?  You shouldn't be. The NYC Water Board is again raising its rates this July by another 12.9 percent. This new increase represents the fourth double-digit boost in the last four years.

2007 - 11.0%
2008 - 14.5%
2009 - 14.0%
2010 - 12.9%

A friend of mine told me that these increases are a good thing, citing the need to conserve this natural resource, and recommended that I "...was just going to have to conserve my use of water to keep my bill down."

Reality Check: Keep in mind that the city's use of water has dropped dramatically over the past three years because of "conservation" and since we have been using less water, the Water Board has said they they must now hike rates to offset lost revenues.

Not unlike our fairy tale charcacters, Jack & Jill, the Water Board operates in a fantasy realm where they can continually raise water rates in the best of both worlds...

"New Yorkers using too much water? We must increase our rates to encourage conservation...",

or,

"New Yorkers conserving too much water?  We're losing revenue and we have to raise rates."

Maybe there is something to all the fuss about "Water - Boarding"!

Peter J. Mahon

Friday, April 2, 2010

This is a United States Congressman!



Hank Johnson is a liberal democrat Congressman representing Georgia’s 4th Congressional District since 2007. The 55 year old Johnson is an attorney and was a former county judge.

Last Friday during a House Armed Services Committee hearing, Congressman Johnson was questioning Admiral Robert Willard, head of the U.S. Pacific fleet, about the stationing of 5,000 additional U.S. Marines and their families on the western Pacific island of Guam, a 212-square-mile American territory that is 30 miles long and from four to 12 miles wide.

I’m not going to say anymore about about Congressman Johnson’s questioning of Admiral Willard as I think it best that you decide for yourself. Just keep in mind that since Johnson is one of 535 members of the United States Congress, everything he says is important. But pay particular attention to the congressman's comments starting at the 1:16 mark and the pregnant pause after his stated concern and hand gestures.

Apparently Congressman Johnson is an advocate of both the global warming movement as well as the "Island tip-over and capsizing" movement.

Keep in mind also that you are paying Congressman Johnson's salary this year -- $174,000.

A "tip of my hat" to Admiral Willard for his professional response to Congresman Johnson's absurd question!

Remember to 2010 general elections are just a few months away!

Peter J. Mahon

Senator Max Baucuas (D-Mont)- Health Care will address the "mal-distribution of income in America."

Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont)
After the Senate passed a "fix-it" bill via their partian "reconciliation" process to make changes to the new health care law, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the influential Finance Committee, must have suffered a temporary attack of "speak honestly" when he admitted to reporters that the health care overhaul was an "income shift" to help the poor.


"Too often, much of late, the last couple three years, the mal-distribution of income in American is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy and the middle income class is left behind," he said. "Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America."

"Mal-distribution of income?" 

We know that the Obama White House has stopped using the term "re-distribution of wealth" as it was not sitting well with most working Americans so I guess Senator Baucus decided that the prefix "mal" (bad) would be appropriate under these circumstances.

Of course, it helps to remember that the good sentaor exempted himself and the rest of his colleagues in Congress from this health care reform bill so I can only guess that the distriution of his inome is just right!

When politicians start using their right hand to complain about individuals in a capitalist democratic republic making too much money you know their left hand will not be far behind to relieve you of your "mal-distributed" income!

Remember the 2010 general elections! 

Peter J. Mahon

Rep. Phil Hare (D-Ill) - "I don't worry about the Constitution..."



Congressman Phil Hare was asked about the constitutionality of the democrats health care reform bill regarding its mandate that all citzens are now mandated to purchase health care insurance. The congressman’s response was not at all surprising…

“I don’t worry about the Constitution on this to be honest with you. I care more about the people who are dying because they do not have health care.”

When asked about his oath of office to swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, Congressman Hare then responded…

"I believe that it says that we have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!”

Someone in the room then had to point out to the Congressman that those words are written in our nation’s Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

The Congressman replied…”It doesn’t matter to me!”

Finally, after some prodding the question was put to Congressman- “Where in the Constitution does it give you the authority to mandate health care coverage for all Americans?”

Congressman Hare replied – “I don’t know.”

It should not come as a shock to anyone that Congressman Hre is a Democrat Representative from the great State of Illinois, home of “Chicago” style politics where corruption and the attitude of the “Constitution be damned” is the order of the day for politicians.

When he told his audience that he had read the entire health care reform bill, consisting of thousands of pages, ”three times”, Congressman Hare dug his hole deeper when violated one of the cardinal rules of debate procedures (Never ask a question that you don’t want an answer to!). When an audience member expressed his doubt about the congressman’s claim, Hare asked if he was being called a “liar.” The expected answer, “yes”, came back at which time Hare left the meeting.

The most telling part of the video is when Congressman Hare is leaving the meeting and driving away in a car, someone calls out to him stating - “Better start looking for a job!”

Remember, the 2010 general elections are just a few short months away. It really is time for “Change!”

Peter J. Mahon

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Robert McChesney and the Obama Administration

Professor Robert McChesney

Like many other conservatives, I routinely read the New York Times, the Washington Post and watch many of the far left pundits on cable television. Doing so provides you with an idea of what the left in this country is up to and I was interested in seeing what the progressive left would gear up for next after their recent health care reform victory.

Lst week I was watching MSNBC host Ed Schultz having a “meltdown” complaining about the fact that our nation’s talk radio is “unfairly” dominated by conservative hosts. Schultz stated that “…the fact is it does not make for a level playing field…ownership has its privileges…Maybe we have reached the point where the Congress needs to equal it out…equal out the audience…Just keep in mind there are no poor people with microphones…Hell, if we’re going to be socialists, let’s be socialists across the board.”

Basically Mr. Schultz is calling for our liberal democrat controlled congress to legislate what the progressive left refers to as the “Fairness Doctrine” which would have the federal government assume control of radio stations and mandate the extent and content of talk radio.

Now if it were just Ed Schultz ranting about ths topic I would afford it much less concern, although I still find it very scary, but what you probably are not aware of is that the chief proponent of this thinking – which amounts to an unprecedented government intrusion into our own country’s media -- is Professor Robert McChesney, founder of the Orwellian-named Free Press, one of the most influential organizations in the growing “media reform” movement on the far-left.

Free Press’ curious stance on media reform can best be summed up by McChesney who suggests that, “Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself."

McChesney has employed his stance repeatedly to argue that his version of media reform is the first step in the struggle to remake American society in a socialistic fashion. In his attack on the existing media “power structure” in the U.S., he calls for a “class struggle from below…In the end there is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.”

As hard as it may be to believe, McChesney and his indefatigable band of media revolutionaries are being taken seriously by some policymakers in Washington. They are granted regular audiences with those overseeing our nation’s media policy at the FCC and FTC, and meeting regularly with members of Congress.
One of his bigest supporters is President Obama's "Diversity Czar" at the FCC, Mark Llloyd.

Their latest plan to defacto nationalize the media calls for the federal government to bail out newspapers with $60 billion in new government subsidies. As anyone familiar with Washington knows, money does not come free. Such subsidies will virtually invite the government into the fourth estate as overseers.

All of this begs the question: If the federal government starts subsidizing our own free press, how long until the feds start revoking broadcast licenses of government opponents and bringing pesky reporters up on charges of say, “corruption” or “subversion”? According to McChesney and the Free Press folks, it apparently can’t happen soon enough.

Remember November 2010 and the general elections are just a few months away. If we don't all pull together to stop this nonsense now, we will ultimately wake up in an America we no longer recognize.

Peter J. Mahon

Those "Pesky" Obama Conections!

Rainbow/Push Coalition 33rd Annual Conference, Chicago, 2004

Last month Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan, a long time supporter of Barack Obama, spoke to a crowd of 20,000 of followers of his black nationalist movement at the United Center in Chicago Farrakhan said that "The white right is trying to set Barack up to be assassinated."

The crowd cheered Farrakhan on with shouts of "Allahu Akbar," Arabic for "God is great."

Farrakhan continued his praise of Obama Sunday, and said the nation's first black president had been manipulated into disavowing Farrakhan. He would not say if he and Obama had ever met. "They all want to know did I ever meet with him and what did I say or what he say," Farrakhan said in the speech. "I ain't going there."

Well someone should "go there."

It should be noted that back in 2004 when Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow/PUSH Coalition held its 33rd annual conference in Chicago a key highlight was the annual Business Luncheon which honored Valerie Jarrett, chair of the Chicago Stock Exchange. Valerie Jarret is now Obama’s senior advisor in the White House.  You remember Valerie Jarret don't you. She was responsible for Obama's appointment of Van Jones as the administration's "green jobs cazar", that is until it became public that Van Jones is a communist and a "9/11 Truther!"

A picture of he luncheon, published in JET Magazine at the time shows Michelle Obama, wife of (then) U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama of Illinois and executive director of community affairs, University of Chicago Hospital and Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, wife of Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan.

So the First Lady and Obama’s senior White House advisor had lunch with Louis Farrakhan’s wife back in 2004, no big deal right?  It's just another of those meaningless pesky Obama connections that contually surface.

Well there is another connection out there. In early March of this year, Reverend Farrakhan received a “LivingLegend” award at a $100 dollar a head charity event sponsored by none other than President Obama’s former pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

In deference to Obama, he threw both of these screwballs under the bus during his presidential campaign, Farrakhan for being anti-semetic and Wright for being completely out of his mind.

Nevertheless, it does give one cause for concern how Obama’s old Chicago affiliations have a habit of continually rearing their heads. Not that you would know about if by reading the New York Times.

Gee, I wonder how the mainstream media would have reacted if they found a picture of First Lady Laura Bush attendng a luncheon with David Duke's wife?

Peter J. Mahon

Robert Creamer and Obama Care

Robert Creamer

Not that you will be reading abut this in the mainstream media but Robert Creamer (pictured above) attended President Obama’s Health Care Reform Bill signing ceremony at the White House last week.

If you are really happy with Obama's health care legislation, you should think about sending Robert Creamer a "thank you" note.  Despite the fact that Creamer is an ex-convict, having served time in a federal lock up for bank fraud and tax evasion, I guess Obama felt it was only right for Creamer to be present at the bill signing since Creamer is the author of the progressive liberal blueprint that led Obama and company to their health care victory. You see, he wrote it while he was in prison.

Creamer, the husband of Illinois Democrat Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, used to be the leader of the Chicago based community group, Citizen Action/Illinois. He also founded its predecessor, Illinois Public Action, in which Ms. Schakowsky served as Program Director. He runs a political consulting firm, the Strategic Consulting Group, which lists ACORN and the SEIU among its clients and which made $541,000 working for disgraced former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich.

Creamer resigned from Citizen Action/Illinois after the FBI began investigating him for bank fraud and tax evasion at Illinois Public Action. He was convicted in 2006 and sentenced to five months in federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, plus eleven months of house arrest.  While in prison—or “forced sabbatical,” he called it—Creamer wrote a lengthy political manual, Listen to Your Mother: Stand Up Straight! How Progressives Can Win.

The book was endorsed by leading Democrats and their allies, including SEIU boss Andy Stern—the most frequent visitor thus far to the Obama White House—and chief Obama strategist David Axelrod, who noted that Creamer’s tome “provides a blueprint for future victories.”

In the book, Creamer draws lessons from decades of experience on the radical left, including the teachings of arch-radical Saul Alinsky, and several episodes from Rep. Schakowsky’s political career.

He also lays out a “Progressive Agenda for Structural Change,” which includes a ten-point plan for foisting universal health care on the American people.

"We must create a national consensus that health care is a right, not a commodity; and that government must guarantee that right.”

“We must create a national consensus that the health care system is in crisis.”

“Our messaging program over the next two years should focus heavily on reducing the credibility of the health insurance industry and focusing on the failure of private health insurance.”

“We need to systematically forge relationships with large sectors of the business/employer community.”

“We need to convince political leaders that they owe their elections, at least in part, to the groundswell of support of universal health care, and that they face political peril if they fail to deliver on universal health care.”

“We need not agree in advance on the components of a plan, but we must foster a process that can ultimately yield consensus.”

“Over the next two years, we must design and organize a massive national field program.”

“We must focus especially on the mobilization of the labor movement and the faith community.”

“We must systematically leverage the connections and resources of a massive array of institutions and organizations of all types.”

“To be successful, we must put in place commitments for hundreds of millions of dollars to be used to finance paid communications and mobilization once the battle is joined.”

Creamer adds: “To win we must not just generate understanding, but emotion—fear, revulsion, anger, disgust.”

Democrats have followed Creamer’s plan to the letter. They have claimed our health care system is in crisis despite polls showing the overwhelming majority of Americans are happy with the care they receive. They have—with the help of President Obama—circulated false horror stories about Americans dying for lack of health care and health insurance.
They have targeted the health insurance industry, with Rep. Schakowsky herself promising to “put the private insurance industry out of business,” though it is a top employer in Illinois.

Democrats cut deals with the pharmaceutical industry and the American Medical Association, among others. They have brought in the President himself to tell wavering “Blue Dog” Democrats that their re-election chances depend on passing health care reform. They have bused in SEIU members to town hall meetings, and used rabbis and pastors to back health care reform from the pulpit. They have bribed and paid off their own fellow democrat members of congress.

They have used a complex, interconnected web of organizations—including Organizing For America, the former Obama campaign arm—to whip up support and silence opposition. And they have benefited from hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising to convince the public to support bills that their representatives have never read themselves.

Creamer wrote his plan in 2006, explicitly proposing that it be carried out once a “progressive Democrat is elected President” and once Democrats could count on 60 votes in the Senate. It is curious that Creamer, sitting in prison, could have predicted the details and the timing of President Obama’s legislative agenda so precisely.  The likeliest explanation is that Creamer helped design the Democrats’ health care strategy. That would explain why President Obama made health care an obsession in 2009, when it was only one among many issues he raised on the campaign trail in 2008. It would explain the role of several overlapping left-wing groups, including Creamer’s own Citizen Action/Illinois.

It would also explain Creamer's high profile after being released from prison when he immediately went to work for the Obama campaign, training volunteers at “Camp Obama.”

He has continued his work at the Strategic Consulting Group, leading “many of the country’s most significant issue campaigns,” he claims.

This isn't the first time Creamer has been to the White Huse. He was also at a White House state dinner this past November—together with Stern, Axelrod, and other cronies—despite the fact that ex-convicts are usually barred from such events.

Creamer’s broader aim, as laid out in his book, is the “democratization of wealth” in America and “progressive control of governments around the world.” He recently wrote, “If we succeed in winning health insurance reform we will have breached the gates of the status quo. We will demonstrate that fundamental change is possible. Into that breach will flow a wave of progressive change.”

It is a radical agenda, making use of Rep. Schakowsky’s public profile as a liberal democrat representative from (where else?) Chicago, a network of far-left organizations, and Creamer’s old friends in the White House.

It can be said that Obama's health care reform was conceived in federal prison, nurtured amidst the corrupt political system of Chicago and ultimately born in the Congress of the United States assisted by midwives Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid over the protests of thousands of ordinary Americans across the nation. It will not end with health care. It will continue until Mr. Creamer’s Alinskyite dream of radical change is realized—or until voters stand up and put a stop to it in 2010.

Peter J. Mahon

Riddle me this...

Riddle me this ladies and gentlemen...

If the liberal democrats are so confident that their new “health care reform bill” is so great, then why are President Obama, Vice President Biden, cabinet secretaries and special congressional staff members excluded from participation in the new government-run health care exchanges?

Isn’t it only fair and logical that top administration officials, who fought so hard for passage of this overhaul of America’s health care system, experience it themselves?

Apparently not.

Although Obama and company have deemed their reform suitable for “Joe the Plumber” and all the rest of us  common-folk,  they made damned sure that they kept their individual (and exclusive) Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP).

The bill was amended behind closed doors by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) back in December to exclude all congressional committee and leadership staff from the horrors of the, now mandated, health care “exchange.” The President, Vice-President, cabinet members, thousands of Obama administration staff and an unknown number of czars will all remain in the FEHBP.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-Okla.) attempted to offer a floor amendment in December that would have nullified Reid’s “behind closed doors” exclusion, but Reid blocked a vote on the amendment.Senator Grassley again offered an amendment to the reconciliation bill during the reconciliation hearings in the Senate to apply the reform legislation to the President, Vice-President, cabinet members, top White House staff and all congressional staffers to no avail as the Democrats blocked it yet again.

But I guess we really shouldn’t worry too much about this government seizure of health care, which constitutes one sixth of the American economy. After all, just yesterday. Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro declared passage of American health care reform "a miracle" and a major victory for Obama's presidency, but couldn't help chide the United States for taking so long to enact what his communist nation achieved decades ago.

Apparently Castro agrees with Vice President Biden who was caught on an open mike at the bill signing ceremony last Tuesday at the White House telling Obama that this “is a big fu%#ing” deal!”

Government has grown tremendously over the last eighty years as politicians have embraced the idea that Washington should be a proxy for family…that we should look to government to provide more and more of what people need or desire rather than depend on our personal and family support systems and our own labor and intelligence.

America has been slowly lumbering towards socialism for years now with the federal government's inability to manage Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, all of which, despite being well meaning, have proved to be disasters and are teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.

The federal government has even proved incapable of a modicum of prudent fiscal stewardship for a service that is actually mandated by our constitution - the United States Postal Service.

Despite that, President Obama has put that journey into overdrive.
In the short space of fourteen months, he has directed the federal government to assimilate the auto industry, the banking and mortgage industries and the insurance industry.

Next on his all encompassing social agenda is energy industry reform, education reform and immigration reform.

Thus, more and more of what we need or, perhaps, desire are not viewed as goals or objectives to be attained, but more as rights that are conferred upon us by the moral obligation one citizen owes to his or her neighbor …which morphs eventually, but assuredly, into a governmental obligation and ultimately federal entitlements.

Our nation is drowning in debt.
Our defict is skyrocketing.

Seventy million baby boomers are ready for retirement.

The percentage of younger American citizens who actually pay taxes is shrinking.

We are truly facing a "perfect storm" of epic fiscal and economic proportions unless we act to put the brakes on this joyride of unbridled spending and deficit driving entitlements now, and by "now" I mean the 2010 general elections!

Peter J. Mahon 

Jody Evans and "Code Pink"

Jody Evans, Co-Founder of "Code Pink" and President Barrack Obama

What do Barrack Obama, Ayers, Bernadette Dorhn and Jane Fonda have in common?  They are all very good friends of Ms. Jody Evans, co-founder of the liberal left "Code Pink" Woemns Peace movement.

Karl Rove, who served as Deputy Chief of Staff to President George W. Bush and who recently authored the book Courage and Consequence: My Life as a Conservative in the Fight, was at a book signing event in California this past Monday evening.

The book signing was disrupted by several protestors, one of whom actually walked up to Rove holding a pair of metal handcuffs in an attempt to make a citizen’s arrest of Rove shouting “Look at what did, you ousted a CIA Officer, you lied to take us to war, you ruined the country, totally ruined the country!”

Although Rove, who was not accompanied by any of his own security staff, attempted to engage in the protestors in discourse, the situation became unmanageable and Rove was forced to leave the event early.
As it turns out the protest was organized by the progressive left organization “Code Pink”, and the woman who attempted to arrest Karl Rove with the metal handcuffs was none other than Jodie Evans, co-founder of the “Code Pink” organization.

Back in 2007, a "Code Pink" operative disrupted a Congressional Hearing where Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was speaking when she assaulted the Secretary of State with hands that were stained red with paint.

In 2008, Jody Evans attempted to disrupt Sarah Plain’s acceptance speech at the Republican convention.

Evans and Code Pink issued a statement justifying the terrorist attack at Fort Hood as opposition to the war from officers and put out a Veterans Day appeal seeking to raise money off the Fort Hood terrorist attack.

Evan’s and her Code Pink organization also ran banner advertisements on the English language version of the official Web site of a terrorist sympathizing group, the Muslim Brotherhood, one of which invites the Muslim Brotherhood to “join us in cleansing our country.” The ad, titled “Arrest the War Criminals” with a subhead that contains the invitation to “join us in cleansing our country” links back to a Code Pink site that calls for the kidnapping of former President George W. Bush, his wife Laura and other former members of his administration through ‘citizens arrests’ for defending America against terrorists in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda.

Muhammad Mahdi Othman Akef, a prominent leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, has expressed his support for suicide bombings in Israel and Iraq “in order to expel the Zionists and the Americans.” He has also denounced the United States as a “Satan,” saying: “I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission.” Many other leaders of the Brotherhood have likewise justified terrorism against Israel and the United States, with many defending the September 11 terrorist attacks against America. Jews are another common object of the Brotherhood’s hatred. Of the Jewish people, Sheik Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, the spiritual leader of the Brotherhood, has written: “There is no dialogue between them and us other than in one language — the language of the sword and force.” It should also not go without notice that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the architect of 9/11, was a member of Muslim Brotherhood. More prominently still, Abdullah Azzam, a Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood preacher, was a mentor to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

Last year, Evans and her Code Pink colleagues held an anti-Israel, pro Hams terrorist group march in Gaza. Security for Evans’ group was provided by Hamas which promised that the terrorist group would keep the marchers safe while they were in Gaza. The Code Pink march was supported by Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts.

Prior to going to Gaza, Evans and company first went to Cairo, Egypt where she joined with none other than William Ayers and his wife, Bernadette Dorhn, both former terrorists with the Weather Underground.. The purpose of the visit to Cairo was to arrange passage for the Code Pink Freedom Marchers to cross the Egyptian Border into Gaza for the march. “We hope the Egyptians get so annoyed they just want to get rid of us.” said Evans at the time.

Jody Evans was listed in the White House “visitor log” as having been at the Obama White House, meeting with administration officials, twice after her trip to Gaza.

Evans and Code Pink also went to Kabul, Afghanistan where she met with top Taliban officials. Although Evans kept her Afghanistan meeting with the Talian secret, her friend, Jane Fonda let it slip during an interview she gave regarding a dinner meeting she had attended with Evans and her husband. While in Afganistan, Evans,who has pulicly stated that she does “a lot to not support the troops", was cleared by the administration to visit a Indiana National Guard unit at a base in Afghanistan.

A few weeks later, Evans was videotaped directly handing to President Barack Obama a package of information about her trip to Afghanistan at a high dollar fundraiser in San Francisco. Jodie Evans also spoke about being called on by Obama’s Deputy Chief of Staff for a morning-after briefing following her hand delivery of the propaganda package to Obama about Afghanistan.

Obama has been consulting with Jodie Evans for nearly three years since first inviting her to co-host the breakthrough Hollywood fundraiser in February 2007 that made his presidential candidacy a serious contender. He appointed her a bundler for his campaign and took tens of thousands of dollars in contributions from her for his Obama for America and Obama Victory Fund campaign vehicles.

All of this is going on right under the noses of the American people and the mainstream media simply won’t report any of it.

Peter J. Mahon